Competent Deontic Reasoning: The Abstract Deontic Selection Task Revisited

نویسندگان

  • Sieghard Beller
  • Andrea Bender
چکیده

The abstract deontic selection task was developed with the aim of demonstrating abstract rule use in a specific domain (i.e., deontic rules). Yet, the solution rate, while being substantially higher than with abstract non-deontic tasks, did not reach the level obtained with concrete deontic tasks. What are the reasons for this—difficulties with abstract rule use? A task analysis based on deontic principles uncovers several problems with the formulation of the task. Three experiments replicate the difficulties with the original task and show that performance increases, when the problems are resolved. The results provide novel insights into the interpretation of deontic rules and into the role that such content-specific, but abstract tasks can play for the study of reasoning processes.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Deontic Logic for Human Reasoning

Deontic logic is shown to be applicable for modelling human reasoning. For this the Wason selection task and the suppression task are discussed in detail. Different versions of modelling norms with deontic logic are introduced and in the case of the Wason selection task it is demonstrated how differences in the performance of humans in the abstract and in the social contract case can be explain...

متن کامل

CHAPTER TWO Is there a facu Ity of deontic reason ing ? A critical re - evaluation of abstract deontic versions of the Wason selection task

DEONTIC RULES ARE PROBLEMATIC FOR SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORY The demonstration that subjects can correctly solve abstract deontic versions of the Wason selection task is widely held to be amongst the most compelling evidence in support of PRST, yet in the debate between advocates of SCT and those of PRST, scant attention is paid to the deep diHiculty that these rules pose to SCT. Yet the reason the...

متن کامل

Alexander Staller Perspective Effects 1 Running Head: Non-deontic Perspective Effects Perspective Effects in Non-deontic Versions of the Wason Selection Task Perspective Effects in Non-deontic Versions of the Wason Selection Task an Example-based Account of Perspective Effects

Perspective Effects 2 Abstract Perspective effects in the Wason four-card selection task occur when people choose mutually exclusive sets of cards depending on the perspective they adopt when making their choice. Previous demonstrations of perspective effects have been limited to deontic contexts; i.e., problem contexts that involve social duty, like permissions and obligations. In three experi...

متن کامل

A Model Theory of Deontic Reasoning About Social Norms

This paper outlines a model theory of deontic reasoning. It proposes that social norms form the basic concept on which deontic inferences operate. The theory unifies and extends current deontic approaches. Empirical findings from the deontic selection task will be presented which

متن کامل

Evolutionary Psychology and Human Reasoning: Testing the Domain-Specificity Hypothesis through Wason Selection Task

The better performance in the selection task with deontic rules, compared to the descriptive version, has been interpreted by evolutionary psychologists as the evidence that human reasoning has been shaped to deal with either global or specific deontic norms. An alternative hypothesis is that the two types of rules have been embedded in two different forms of reasoning, about and from a rule, t...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012